Form, science, and narrative in the Anthropocene

16Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A signifcant strand of contemporary fction engages with scientifc models that highlight a constitutive interdependency between humanity and material realities such as the climate or the geological history of our planet. Tis article looks at the ways in which narrative may capture this human-nonhuman interrelation, which occupies the foreground of debates on the so-called Anthropocene. I argue that the formal dimension of scientifc knowledge-as manifested by diagrams or metaphors used by scientists-is central to this narrative remediation. I explore two analogical strategies through which narrative may pursue a formal dialogue with science: clusters of metaphorical language and the global structuring of the plot. Rivka Galchen's novel Atmospheric Disturbances (2008), for instance, builds on a visual representation of meteorological patterns in a storm (lifed from an actual scientifc paper) to stage the narrator's mental illness. Two other contemporary works (Orfeo by Richard Powers and A Tale for the Time Being by Ruth Ozeki) integrate scientifc models through the overall design of the plot. By ofering close readings of these novels, I seek to expand work in the area of New Formalism and show how formal choices are crucial to bringing together the human-scale world and more-than-human phenomena.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Caracciolo, M. (2019). Form, science, and narrative in the Anthropocene. Narrative, 27(3), 270–289. https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2019.0016

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free