The Inconsistency of Inconsistency Scales: A Comparison of Two Widely Used Measures

17Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

This study compared the inconsistent responding validity scales of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and the Psychopathic Personality Inventory (PPI)/PPI-Revised (PPI-R) in two correctional samples to determine the extent to which they overlap in identifying invalid profiles. Results revealed substantial differences in the way the inconsistent responding validity scales of these measures performed. In particular, the PAI identified far fewer participants as having responded inconsistently compared with the PPI/PPI-R. We discuss the implications of our findings for clinical practice, and potential concerns with the use of a single measure to identify inconsistent responding in clinical practice and research. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nikolova, N. L., Hendry, M. C., Douglas, K. S., Edens, J. F., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2012). The Inconsistency of Inconsistency Scales: A Comparison of Two Widely Used Measures. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 30(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.1996

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free