Comparing Associations Between the Built Environment and Walking in Rural Small Towns and a Large Metropolitan Area

45Citations
Citations of this article
126Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The association between the built environment (BE) and walking has been studied extensively in urban areas, yet little is known whether the same associations hold for smaller, rural towns. This analysis examined objective measures of the BE around participants’ residence and their utilitarian and recreational walking from two studies, one in the urban Seattle area (n = 464) and the other in nine small U.S. towns (n = 299). After adjusting for sociodemographics, small town residents walked less for utilitarian purposes but more for recreational purposes. These differences were largely explained by differential associations of the BE on walking in the two settings. In Seattle, the number of neighborhood restaurants was positively associated with utilitarian walking, but in small towns, the association was negative. In small towns, perception of slow traffic on nearby streets was positively associated with recreational walking, but not in Seattle. These observations suggest that urban–rural context matters when planning BE interventions to support walking.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stewart, O. T., Vernez Moudon, A., Saelens, B. E., Lee, C., Kang, B., & Doescher, M. P. (2016). Comparing Associations Between the Built Environment and Walking in Rural Small Towns and a Large Metropolitan Area. Environment and Behavior, 48(1), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916515612253

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free