Does Joystick Training Facilitate Relational Learning?

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Thirteen naïve capuchin monkeys (Cebus [Sapajus] apella) were manually tested with the transfer index (TI) procedure, a species-fair paradigm for assessing the capacity to learn and transfer learning. The animals were then trained to manipulate a joystick to control a cursor and to respond to stimuli on a computer screen. After the animals had mastered the remote cause-and-effect relations required by the computerized test system, they were returned to manual TI testing to determine whether the joystick-training intervention had affected the monkeys’ capacity for efficient and relational learning. TI scores and overall accuracy were higher following the joystick intervention, but these differences were not statistically significant. Two-choice discrimination learning and reversal appeared to be associative in nature, and there was no evidence that joystick training made the monkeys more rule-like or relational in their learning. Despite the absence of significant differences, the patterns of results encourage further study of the ways that changes in the cognitive competencies of nonhuman animals might be catalyzed by significant learning experiences.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Whitham, W., Johnson, J. M., French, K., Beran, M. J., & Washburn, D. A. (2018). Does Joystick Training Facilitate Relational Learning? International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 31, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.46867/IJCP.2018.31.03.07

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free