Profiting from probability; combining low and high probability isotopes as a tool extending the dynamic range of an assay measuring amphetamine and methamphetamine in urine

5Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A wide range of concentrations are frequently observed when measuring drugs of abuse in urine toxicology samples; this is especially true for amphetamine and methamphetamine. Routine liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry confirmatory methods commonly anchored at a 50 ng/mL lower limit of quantitation can span approximately a 100-fold concentration range before regions of non-linearity are reached deteriorating accurate quantitation and qualitative assessments. In our experience, approximately a quarter of amphetamine and methamphetamine positive samples are above a 5,000 ng/mL upper limit of quantitation and thus require reanalysis with dilution for accurate quantitative and acceptable qualitative results. We present here the development of an analytical method capable of accurately quantifying samples with concentrations spanning several orders of magnitude without the need for sample dilution and reanalysis. For each analyte the major isotopes were monitored for analysis through the lower concentration ranges (50-5,000 ng/mL), and the naturally occurring, low probability 13C2 isotopes were monitored for the analysis of the high concentration samples (5,000-100,000 ng/mL amphetamine and 5,000- 200,000 ng/mL methamphetamine). The method simultaneously monitors transitions for the molecules containing only 12C and 13C2 isotopologues eliminating the need for re-extraction and reanalysis of high concentration samples.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miller, A. M., Goggin, M. M., Nguyen, A., Gozum, S. D., & Janis, G. C. (2017). Profiting from probability; combining low and high probability isotopes as a tool extending the dynamic range of an assay measuring amphetamine and methamphetamine in urine. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 41(5), 355–359. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkx028

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free