Un musulman peut-il vivre sur une terre occupée ? L'avis de ammād b. Muammad al-Sūqī, un ālim touareg, sur la colonisation française

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

At the beginning of colonial occupation in the early twentieth century in central Sahara and Sahel, Arabic language and script, widely in use for centuries in these Muslim societies, continued to be the vehicles of law, religion, personal writing and correspondence, including with the colonisers. However, the importance of Muslim writing culture and its role in the early days of colonial occupation are still largely to be assessed. The intellectual responses of Muslim scholars to colonialism in this area reflect the four classical Islamic answers on the matter: avoidance through higra, submission, confrontations especially through gihad and alliance or accommodation. This paper analyses and offers a translation of a manuscript composed by a Kel Essuk Tuareg scholar from what is today Mali, who chose to accommodate the colonisers and produced a text in response to the accusations of apostasy (takfir), perversion (tafsiq) and injustice (tagwir), levelled against his community.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lefebvre, C., & El-Aloui, A. (2025). Un musulman peut-il vivre sur une terre occupée ? L’avis de ammād b. Muammad al-Sūqī, un ālim touareg, sur la colonisation française. Arabica, 72(6), 745–807. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700585-01236945

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free