Causal inference and effect estimation using observational data

63Citations
Citations of this article
151Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Observational studies aiming to estimate causal effects often rely on conceptual frameworks that are unfamiliar to many researchers and practitioners. We provide a clear, structured overview of key concepts and terms, intended as a starting point for readers unfamiliar with the causal inference literature. First, we introduce theoretical frameworks underlying causal effect estimation methods: the counterfactual theory of causation, the potential outcomes framework, structural equations and directed acyclic graphs. Second, we define the most common causal effect estimands, and the issues of effect measure modification, interaction and mediation (direct and indirect effects). Third, we define the assumptions required to estimate causal effects: exchangeability, positivity, consistency and non-interference. Fourth, we define and explain biases that arise when attempting to estimate causal effects, including confounding, collider bias, selection bias and measurement bias. Finally, we describe common methods and study designs for causal effect estimation, including covariate adjustment, G-methods and natural experiment methods.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Igelström, E., Craig, P., Lewsey, J., Lynch, J., Pearce, A., & Katikireddi, S. V. (2022). Causal inference and effect estimation using observational data. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 76(11), 960–966. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2022-219267

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free