Allosteric activation of L-lactate dehydrogenase analyzed by hybrid enzymes with effector-sensitive and -insensitive subunits

24Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Subunit-hybrid enzymes of mutant tetrameric L-lactate dehydrogenases from Bifidobacterium longum were studied in an examination of the mechanism of allosteric activation by fructose 1,6-bisphosphate. We earlier developed an in vivo method for subunit hybridization in Escherichia coli and the hybrids formed were a mixture with different subunit compositions. The B. longum hybrids were separated by anion-exchange chromatography with a mutational tag. Hybrids formed between fructose 1,6-bisphosphate- desensitized subunits and wild-type subunits and also between fructose 1,6- bisphosphate-desensitized subunits and catalytically inactive subunits. Kinetic analyses of the hybrid enzymes showed that (i) those residues from two symmetrically related subunits that constituted the fructose 1,6- bisphosphate-binding site could bind fructose 1,6-hisphosphate and activate the enzyme only if intact, (ii) hybrids with only one functional fructose 1,6-hisphosphate-binding site were fully sensitive to fructose 1,6- bisphosphate, but the allosteric equilibrium had shifted partially, and (iii) activation by fructose 1,6-bisphosphate at the fructose 1,6-bisphosphate- binding site was transmitted to the active sites through a quaternary structural change, not through direct conformational change within a subunit. These results are evidence of the validity of the concerted allosteric model of this enzyme based on T- and R-state structures in the same crystal lattice proposed earlier.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fushinobu, S., Kamata, K., Iwata, S., Sakai, H., Ohta, T., & Matsuzawa, H. (1996). Allosteric activation of L-lactate dehydrogenase analyzed by hybrid enzymes with effector-sensitive and -insensitive subunits. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 271(41), 25611–25616. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.41.25611

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free