Mapping the Middle East from Within: (Counter-)Cartographies of an Imperialist Construction

34Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The "Middle East" is a readily accepted geographical category throughout much of the world. However, within this ambiguous geographic entity, both the term and the idea of the "Middle East" are often rejected as western-imperialist constructs. Through a critical examination of an extensive sample of maps produced within several Arab states of the "Middle East", I found that the regional designation "Middle East" is nearly nonexistent, while the Arab Homeland is unequivocally a more common regional category. However, the "Middle East" did occasionally appear in a few maps. This paper provides an explanatory examination of the normative cartographic discourses in this region, and more focused analysis of the atypical maps of the "Middle East". My analyses render unique insights into how the "Middle East" is both contested and re-created from within a western-imperialist defined region. © 2012 The Author. Antipode © 2012 Antipode Foundation Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Culcasi, K. (2012). Mapping the Middle East from Within: (Counter-)Cartographies of an Imperialist Construction. Antipode, 44(4), 1099–1118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00941.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free