A new method of auditing surgical mortality rates: Application to a group of elderly general surgical patients

31Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In a prospective study of 505 patients aged 65 years or over admitted to a general surgical unit the overall hospital mortality rate was 14.5% and the postoperative mortality rate 12.0%. These rates fell to 3.6% and 5.8% respectively when deaths in non-viable patients were excluded from the analysis. An audit of surgical outcome that fails to identify non-viable patients is therefore potentially misleading. A standardised system of reporting surgical mortality is proposed to aid the comparison of results from different units. The key elements of this system are (a) the separation of the results from nonviable and potentially viable patients; (b) the consideration of both operative and non-operative mortality; (c) the differentiation between medical and surgical causes of postoperative mortality; and (d) the identification of patients who are discharged from the unit but who have residual malignancy. Data presented in such a way should be of direct relevance to surgeons and physicians who are seeking ways of improving the service provided for surgical patients of all ages.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Seymour, D. G., & Pringle, R. (1982). A new method of auditing surgical mortality rates: Application to a group of elderly general surgical patients. British Medical Journal, 284(6328), 1539–1542. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.284.6328.1539

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free