No transport? No worries! Cardiac telerehabilitation is a feasible and effective alternative to centre-based programs

17Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Given the under-utilisation of cardiac rehabilitation despite its benefits, there has been a shift towards alternative delivery models. The recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has accelerated this shift, leading to a growing interest in home-based cardiac rehabilitation including telerehabilitation. There is increasing evidence to support cardiac telerehabilitation, with studies generally demonstrating comparable outcomes and potential cost-benefits. This review aims to provide a synopsis of the current evidence on home-based cardiac rehabilitation with a focus on telerehabilitation and practical considerations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hwang, R., Gane, E. M., & Morris, N. R. (2023, November 1). No transport? No worries! Cardiac telerehabilitation is a feasible and effective alternative to centre-based programs. Heart Failure Reviews. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-023-10301-w

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free