Adding Inflammatory Markers and Refining National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Criteria Improve Diagnostic Accuracy for Alcohol-associated Hepatitis

Abstract

Background & Aims: Although histology is considered the gold standard for diagnosis of alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH), it is not required for entry into therapeutic studies if patients meet National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) consensus criteria for probable AH. Our aim was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of NIAAA criteria against liver biopsy and to explore new criteria to enhance diagnostic accuracy for AH. Methods: A total of 268 consecutive patients with alcohol-related liver disease with liver biopsy were prospectively included: 210 and 58 in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. NIAAA criteria and histological diagnosis of alcoholic steatohepatitis (ASH) were independently reviewed by clinical investigators and pathologists from Hospital Clínic and Mayo Clinic. Using biopsy-proven ASH as gold standard we determined diagnostic capability of NIAAA criteria and proposed the new improved criteria. Results: In the derivation cohort, diagnostic accuracy of NIAAA for AH was modest (72%) due to low sensitivity (63%). Subjects who did not meet NIAAA with ASH at liver biopsy had lower 1-year survival compared with subjects without ASH (70% vs 90%; P < .001). NIAAAm-CRP criteria, created by adding C-reactive protein and modifying the variables of the original NIAAA, had higher sensitivity (70%), accuracy (78%), and specificity (83%). Accuracy was also higher in a sensitivity analysis in severe AH (74% vs 65%). In the validation cohort, NIAAAm-CRP and NIAAA criteria had a sensitivity of 56% vs 52% and an accuracy of 76% vs 69%, respectively. Conclusion: NIAAA criteria are suboptimal for the diagnosis of AH. The proposed NIAAAm-CRP criteria may improve accuracy for noninvasive diagnosis of AH in patients with alcohol-related liver disease.