Integrative behavioral couple therapy vs. traditional behavioral couple therapy: A theoretical review of the differential effectiveness

10Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to compare the differential effectiveness of two couple therapies, the Traditional Behavioral Couple Therapy (TBCT) and the Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy (IBCT). Although the latter can be seen as an evolution of the first, both are based on different theoretical concepts. Starting from the analysis of 12 studies comparing TBCT and IBCT, conclusions about effectiveness and future perspectives of both approaches are discussed. Our results show that TBCT and IBCT have distinct courses of change and differ fundamentally in what the therapist does in-session, impacting couple behavior both in and out of session. Currently, in line with the most important randomized trials in this field, a slight advantage for IBCT over TBCT in treating distressed couples at two points in time -when treatment is completed and in the first years post-therapy- can be confirmed, although at a five-year follow-up results equalize. Furthermore, some studies cannot confirm significant changes, but clinically relevant ones, which point toward a higher impact of IBCT. Lastly, the article includes limitations of the review as well and offers some orientations, which should be considered for future research. © 2013 Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Perissutti, C., & Barraca, J. (2013). Integrative behavioral couple therapy vs. traditional behavioral couple therapy: A theoretical review of the differential effectiveness. Clinica y Salud, 24(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.5093/cl2013a2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free