Adapting to a global pandemic through live virtual delivery of a cancer collaborative trial group conference: The TROG 2020 experience

18Citations
Citations of this article
185Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: The global COVID-19 pandemic forced the cancellation of the TROG 2020 face to face Annual Scientific Meeting (ASM). It was instead delivered as a live virtual meeting with 6 days of planning. Here, we report the participants’ experience of this live virtual meeting. Method: Participants were invited to complete custom-developed, pre- and post-meeting surveys to assess their expectations of and satisfaction with the live virtual format. Speakers and moderators were also invited to complete a custom-developed satisfaction survey. The working parties of TROG (head/neck/skin, genitourinary, breast and lung) were also sampled. Results: In total, 188/273 (69%) registered participants logged in to the live virtual meeting. The online engagement for each of the oral sessions ranged from 53 to 66%. There were 102 and 57 responders to the online pre- and post-meeting surveys, respectively. The majority of pre-meeting responders indicated a significant level of employer support to attend the virtual meeting. Post-meeting satisfaction exceeded pre-meeting expectations (‘very much’ and ‘quite a bit’; 86% vs. 54%; P < 0.0001). The majority indicated they would be ‘quite a bit’ or ‘very much’ interested in future live virtual meetings. Conclusion: The TROG 2020 ASM was conducted as a live virtual meeting. Participant satisfaction and future interest in a live virtual meeting was high, indicating this is a viable platform for other CCTG’s faced with the decision to deliver virtual content at times of global public health threats.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McDowell, L., Goode, S., & Sundaresan, P. (2020). Adapting to a global pandemic through live virtual delivery of a cancer collaborative trial group conference: The TROG 2020 experience. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology, 64(3), 414–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.13047

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free