Impact of prone position on dead-space fraction in COVID-19 related acute respiratory distress syndrome

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: COVID-19 Related Acute Respiratory Syndrome (C-ARDS) is characterized by a mismatch between respiratory mechanics and hypoxemia, suggesting increased dead-space fraction (DSF). Prone position is a cornerstone treatment of ARDS under invasive mechanical ventilation reducing mortality. We sought to investigate the impact of prone position on DSF in C-ARDS in a cohort of patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation. Methods: we retrospectively analysed data from 85 invasively mechanically ventilated patients with C-ARDS in supine and in prone positions, hospitalized in Intensive Care Unit (Reims University Hospital), between November, 1st 2020 and November, 1st 2022. DSF was estimated via 3 formulas usable at patients’ bedside, based on partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) and end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2). Results: there was no difference of DSF between supine and prone position, using the 3 formulas. According to Enghoff, Frankenfield and Gattinoni equations, DSF in supine vs. prone position was in median respectively [IQR]: 0.29 [0.13–0.45] vs. 0.31 [0.19–0.51] (p = 0.37), 0.5 [0.48–0.52] vs. 0.51 [0.49–0.53] (p = 0.43), and 0.71 [0.55–0.87] vs. 0.69 [0.57–0.81], (p = 0.32). Conclusion: prone position did not change DSF in C-ARDS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Théry, G., Scemama, A., Roblin, E., Caplan, M., Mourvillier, B., & Goury, A. (2024). Impact of prone position on dead-space fraction in COVID-19 related acute respiratory distress syndrome. BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-024-02845-w

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free