Factors affecting the test-retest variability of Heidelberg retina tomograph and Heidelberg retina tomograph II measurements

97Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the test-retest variability of stereometric parameter measurements made with the Heidelberg retina tomograph (HRT) and Heidelberg retina tomograph-II (HRT-II), and to establish which parameter(s) provided the most repeatable and reliable measurements with both devices. An investigation into the factors affecting the repeatability of the measurements of this parameter(s) was conducted. Methods: 43 ocular hypertensive and 31 glaucoma subjects were recruited to a test-retest study. One eye from each subject underwent HRT and HRT-II imaging by two observers on each of two occasions within 6 weeks of each other. Lens grading was carried out by LOCS III grading and Scheimpflug camera generated densitogram analysis. Results: Rim area (RA) and mean cup depth measurements were found to be least variable. Both inter-test reference height difference and image quality had a strong relation (R 2>0.5, p<0.0001) with inter-test RA difference and, together, are responsible for 70% of RA measurement variability. Image quality was influenced by lens opacity, cylindrical error, and age. Inter-test RA measurement differences were unrelated to the observer or visit interval. Conclusions: RA represents an appropriate measure for monitoring glaucomatous progression. Reference height difference and image quality were the factors that most influenced RA measurement variability. Image analysis strategies that address these factors may reduce test-retest variability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Strouthidis, N. G., White, E. T., Owen, V. M. F., Ho, T. A., Hammond, C. J., & Garway-Heath, D. F. (2005). Factors affecting the test-retest variability of Heidelberg retina tomograph and Heidelberg retina tomograph II measurements. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 89(11), 1427–1432. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2005.067298

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free