Abstract
A recurring and problematic characteristic of information systems’ (IS) use has been the development of isolated ‘islands of information’. As technological advances have provided solutions, so, however, have the original problems been transformed. The current archipelago exists largely unrecognized, partly because the matter from which the islands are formed has also changed. It is no longer the content of the computerized systems that is isolated but information about IS practice itself. Academic research, practitioner reports and vendor marketing all contribute to a disparate collection of contradictory and often unevaluated information concerning IS practice, while the large volume of this information and the ease of its accessibility serve to disguise the extent of its fragmentation.Following the lead established by medicine and healthcare, the creation of an ‘evidence-based’ culture within the IS community, particularly the creation of systematic analyses of relevant literature, has been proposed as one means of bridging the gaps between these islands. There are, however, significant differences between IS and healthcare which need to be recognized if the transfer of concepts is to be successful. In this paper we identify and describe some of those differences and provide an initial sketch of a framework in which an evidence-based IS culture could flourish. © 2000, Sage Publications. All rights reserved.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Atkins, C., & Louw, G. (2000). Building bridges: Constructing a framework for evidence-based information systems. Health Informatics Journal, 6(3), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/146045820000600302
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.