Fraud Hexagon and Fraudulent Financial Statement: Comparison Between OMI and Beneish Model

  • Nugroho D
  • Diyanty V
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
142Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The leading cause of financial statement fraud (FFS) is a "poor tone" carried out by top parties. This study examines the effect of elements in Hexagon Fraud on FFS. This study uses logistic regression analysis and a random effect regression model. The data used are all non-financial companies in Indonesia in 2016-2020. We compare the accuracy of the M-score findings using the Overall Manipulation Index (OMI) approach. The results showed slightly different findings when FFS was measured using two different measurements. Rationalization is proven to affect the occurrence of FFS; both measured using the M-score and OMI. Stimulus and opportunity partially influence the occurrence of FFS. This study also demonstrates which elements in the financial statements are often used as a tool to perform FFS and finds evidence that DEPI is the item most frequently used to perform FFS. On the other hand, the sector that is indicated to conduct FFS often is the cyclical consumer sector.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nugroho, D. S., & Diyanty, V. (2022). Fraud Hexagon and Fraudulent Financial Statement: Comparison Between OMI and Beneish Model. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Economics, Management and Accounting (ICEMAC 2021) (Vol. 207). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220204.001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free