Urgent coronary bypass surgery for failed percutaneous coronary intervention in the stent era: Is backup still necessary?

24Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background Current practice guidelines for performance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the United States mandate availability of on-site surgical backup. With the decreasing frequency of urgent coronary bypass surgery (UCABG) with newer technologies, it is unclear whether such backup continues to be necessary. Methods A database of 5655 consecutive patients undergoing PCI at a single center between August 1, 1992, and December 31, 1997, was analyzed. Outcomes were determined as well as clinical, lesion, and procedural characteristics of patients during 4 time periods preceding and during use of coronary stenting. Results Frequency of UCABG for failed PCI decreased from 2.2% to 0.6% in the most recent time period (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shubrooks, S. J., Nesto, R. W., Leeman, D., Waxman, S., Lewis, S. M., Fitzpatrick, P., & Dib, N. (2001). Urgent coronary bypass surgery for failed percutaneous coronary intervention in the stent era: Is backup still necessary? American Heart Journal, 142(1), 190–196. https://doi.org/10.1067/mhj.2001.116077

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free