Docetaxel plus epidoxorubicin as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with large operable or locally advanced carcinoma of the breast: A single-center, phase II study

64Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BACKGROUND. The objective of this study was to test the activity and toxicity of epirubicin plus docetaxel as primary chemotherapy for women with large, operable (T2; > 3 cm) or locally advanced (Stage III) breast carcinoma, including patients with inflammatory breast carcinoma. METHODS. In this single-center, open-label, single-stage, Phase II trial, epirubicin (75 mg/m2; intravenous bolus) followed by docetaxel (80 mg/m2; 1-hour intravenous infusion) was administered on Day 1 of each cycle for four cycles. RESULTS. Nine of 30 patients (30%) had inflammatory breast carcinoma. Twenty-three patients (76.7%; 95% confidence interval, 57.7-90.1) had a clinical objective response that was complete in 6 patients (20%). Twenty-seven patients (90%) underwent surgery that was conservative in 5 patients (16.7%). Pathologic response evaluation revealed four complete responses (13.3%; 95% confidence interval, 3.8-30.7). Grade 4 neutropenia was recorded in 80.0% of patients, and febrile neutropenia was recorded in one-third of patients. Anemia and thrombocytopenia were never severe. Other side effects were diarrhea (26.6%), oral mucositis (43.3%), and emesis (26.6%). CONCLUSIONS. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin plus docetaxel was a feasible treatment and was active in an unfavorable series of patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma, including patients with inflammatory breast carcinoma. © 2002 American Cancer Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Matteis, A., Nuzzo, F., D’Aiuto, G., Labonia, V., Landi, G., Rossi, E., … Perrone, F. (2002). Docetaxel plus epidoxorubicin as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with large operable or locally advanced carcinoma of the breast: A single-center, phase II study. Cancer, 94(4), 895–901. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20335

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free