The Between

0Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Thinking with this special issue's group of feminist thinkers–some artists and others scholars–this introduction makes a strong case for co-authorship and a more collaborative humanities, while also insisting that the couple form–that stalwart object of queer and feminist theory–is neither a known quantity nor an exhausted entity, but rather, a field ripe for analysis. Situated squarely within performance studies, this introduction pivots away from questions of ontology and toward method and performativity, in order to ask: what modes of intellectual practice, erotic exchange, political work, and aesthetic experimentation happen uniquely within couple forms, in their most capacious and non-self-same iterations? What queer and feminist work can they do? What, in other words, is possible in the infinity, if indeed it is an infinity, between one and two?.

References Powered by Scopus

Sex in public

1298Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The ontology of the couple: Or, what queer theory knows about numbers

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gagnon, O. M., & McMaster, J. (2019, September 2). The Between. Women and Performance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/0740770X.2019.1685338

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘20‘21‘22‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

73%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

10%

Researcher 2

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 10

43%

Arts and Humanities 5

22%

Engineering 4

17%

Environmental Science 4

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0