Budgetary Transparency and Democracy: The Effectiveness of Control Institutions

  • Zucolotto R
  • Teixeira M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to identify the effectiveness of the Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs) and of the legislatures in relation to the fiscal transparency of countries. To test the theory empirically, an analysis was also conducted of how transparency improves accountability and how transparency and accountability jointly relate to the degree of democracy of a country and to the perception of corruption. To conduct the proposed test, multiple linear regression models were used with the ordinary minimum squares method. The data were obtained from official reports on transparency, democracy and corruption, such as Open Budget Partnership, Transparency International, The Economist Intelligence Unit’s Index and Index Mundi. The results have shown that countries in which the legislatures and the SAIs have greater constitutionally determined interdependence have greater budgetary transparency. It was also found that countries that are more transparent have more and better accountability mechanisms and, consequently, a greater level of democracy and less corruption, all of which points to the importance of transparency in the process of democratic consolidation

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zucolotto, R., & Teixeira, M. A. C. (2014). Budgetary Transparency and Democracy: The Effectiveness of Control Institutions. International Business Research, 7(6). https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v7n6p83

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free