Comparison of Photopic Negative Response of Full-Field and Focal Electroretinograms in Detecting Glaucomatous Eyes

  • Machida S
  • Tamada K
  • Oikawa T
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose . To compare the photopic negative response (PhNR) of the full-field electroretinogram (ERG) to the PhNR of the focal ERGs in detecting glaucoma. Methods . One hundred and three eyes with glaucoma and 42 normal eyes were studied. Full-field ERGs were elicited by red stimuli on a blue background. The focal ERGs were elicited by a 15 ∘ white stimulus spot centered on the macula, the superotemporal or the inferotemporal areas of the macula. Results . In early glaucoma, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were significantly larger for the focal PhNR (0.863–0.924) than those for the full-field PhNR (0.666–0.748) ( P < .05 ). The sensitivity was significantly higher for the focal PhNR than for the full-field PhNR in early ( P < .01 ) and intermediate glaucoma ( P < .05 ). In advanced glaucoma, there was no difference in the AUCs and sensitivities between the focal and full-field PhNRs. Conclusions . The focal ERG has the diagnostic ability with higher sensitivity in detecting early and intermediate glaucoma than the full-field ERG.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Machida, S., Tamada, K., Oikawa, T., Gotoh, Y., Nishimura, T., Kaneko, M., & Kurosaka, D. (2011). Comparison of Photopic Negative Response of Full-Field and Focal Electroretinograms in Detecting Glaucomatous Eyes. Journal of Ophthalmology, 2011, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/564131

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free