Forced-molting methods and their effects on the performance and egg quality of Japanese quails (Coturnix japonica) in the second laying cycle

11Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The experiment was carried out in the experimental poultry house of the Research and Development Unit of Brotas of Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios do Centro-Oeste, SP, Brazil. The objective of the study was to evaluate the performance of Japanese quails submitted to forced molting aiming at optimizing the use of the same quail flock by promoting a second laying cycle. A total number of 400 67-day-old Japanese quails in lay, previously submitted to 14 days of forced molting, was distributed in a completely randomized experimental design into five treatments (T1= not submitted to forced molting, T2= 03 days of fasting + fed ad libitum, T3= 01 days of fasting + 13 days of feed restriction, T4= 02 days of fasting + 12 days of feed restriction, and T5= 03 days of fasting + 11 days of feed restriction. Feeds were contained equal nutrient levels, and were formulated according to NRC (1994) recommendations. There were significant differences among the studied treatments. Although the treatment of 3 days of fasting followed by ad libitum feeding resulted in lower egg weight, it promoted better lay percentage, egg mass, and feed conversion ratios (FCR/dz and FCR/kg). On the other hand, 3 days of fasting followed by restricted feeding resulted in higher feed intake and worse feed conversion ratios (FCR/dz and FCR/kg). When birds were not submitted to forced molting, they presented lower lay percentage and egg mass.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Faitarone, A. B. G., Garcia, E. A., Pizzolante, C. C., Molino, A. B., Pelícia, K., & Berto, D. A. (2008). Forced-molting methods and their effects on the performance and egg quality of Japanese quails (Coturnix japonica) in the second laying cycle. Revista Brasileira de Ciencia Avicola / Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 10(1), 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2008000100008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free