Evaluation of the endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published systematic review and meta-analyses

  • Panic N
  • Leoncini E
  • de Belvis G
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

IntroductionPRISMA statement was developed in order set standards in the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of PRISMA endorsement on the methodological quality and the quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, published in scientific journals in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology (GH).Methods

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Panic, N., Leoncini, E., de Belvis, G., Ricciardi, W., & Boccia, S. (2013). Evaluation of the endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published systematic review and meta-analyses. European Journal of Public Health, 23(suppl_1). https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckt124.018

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free