Robo-decision: Algorithms, legal interpretation, predictive justice

Abstract

Predictability and predictive justice as an opportunity to foresee the judicial proceedings' outputs, considering all the risks related to the use of automated decision-makings. The study is based on a question: is the judge replaceable by a robot? The adopted approach aims at asserting that the robo-decisions and the hu-mans' ones may be affected by misstatements and the automated decision-makings may not be regarded as "fair", even if they seem to be logically "correct": indeed, no algorithmic systems is infallible.