Caveat emptor, computational social science: Large-scale missing data in a widely-published reddit corpus

60Citations
Citations of this article
105Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

As researchers use computational methods to study complex social behaviors at scale, the validity of this computational social science depends on the integrity of the data. On July 2, 2015, Jason Baumgartner published a dataset advertised to include “every publicly available Reddit comment” which was quickly shared on Bittorrent and the Internet Archive. This data quickly became the basis of many academic papers on topics including machine learning, social behavior, politics, breaking news, and hate speech. We have discovered substantial gaps and limitations in this dataset which may contribute to bias in the findings of that research. In this paper, we document the dataset, substantial missing observations in the dataset, and the risks to research validity from those gaps. In summary, we identify strong risks to research that considers user histories or network analysis, moderate risks to research that compares counts of participation, and lesser risk to machine learning research that avoids making representative claims about behavior and participation on Reddit.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gaffney, D., & Matias, J. N. (2018). Caveat emptor, computational social science: Large-scale missing data in a widely-published reddit corpus. PLoS ONE, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200162

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free