Direct haemodynamic effects of pulmonary arteriovenous malformation embolisation

22Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background Transcatheter embolisation is widely used to close pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs) in patients with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT). Data on the direct cardiovascular haemodynamic changes induced by this treatment are scarce. Objectives We investigated the direct haemodynamic effects of transcatheter embolisation of PAVMs, using non-invasive finger pressure measurements. Methods During the procedure, blood pressure, heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), total peripheral resistance (TPR) and delta pressure/delta time (dP/dt) were continuously monitored using a Finometer®. Potential changes in these haemodynamic parameters were calculated from the pressure registrations using Modelflow® methodology. Absolute and relative changes were calculated and compared using the paired sample t-test. Results The present study includes 29 HHT patients (mean age 39 ± 15 years, 11 men) who underwent transcatheter embolotherapy of PAVMs. The total number of embolisations was 72 (mean per patient 2.5). Directly after PAVM closure, SV and CO decreased significantly by -11.9 % (p = 0.01) and -9.5 % (p = 0.01) respectively, without a significant change in HR (1.8 %). Mean arterial blood pressure increased by 4.1 % (p = 0.02), while the TPR and dP/dt did not increase significantly (5.8 % and 0.2 %, respectively). Conclusions Significant haemodynamic changes occur directly after transcatheter embolisation of PAVMs, amongst which a decrease in stroke volume and cardiac output are most important. © The Author(s) 2014.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vorselaars, V. M. M., Velthuis, S., Mager, J. J., Snijder, R. J., Bos, W. J., Vos, J. A., … Post, M. C. (2014). Direct haemodynamic effects of pulmonary arteriovenous malformation embolisation. Netherlands Heart Journal, 22(7–8), 328–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-014-0539-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free