Retentiveness of metal coping luted to teeth of uremic patients undergoing hemodialysis using five different luting cements

1Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the retention of metal copings luted to uremic teeth with five different luting agents. Methods: A total of 35 sound natural molars was collected from uremic patients and randomly assigned into five groups (n=7). The teeth were prepared for metal copings using diamond tips and water coolant. Metal copings with a loop on the occlusal surface were fabricated using base metal alloy (Rexillium III). The copings were luted using Fuji I, glass ionomer (GI); Fuji Plus, resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI); Panavia F 2.0, resin cement; Rely X Unicem, self-adhesive cement (SA); and Adhesor, zinc phosphate cement (ZPh). All specimens were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours, conditioned in artificial saliva for 7 days, and then thermocycled for 5000 cycles (5°C-55°C). The dislodging force was measured using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min. The mode of failure of the loaded adhesive copings was evaluated. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc test. Results: GI and SA cements had the highest and the lowest mean retentive strength, respectively (580.90±17.3, 406.6±12.7). There was no significant difference between ZPh, SA, and resin cements. These cements were inferior to GI and RMGI cements (p<0.05), which showed statistically similar retentive strengths. Conclusions: The results of this study support the use of glass ionomer and resin-modified glass ionomer cements for luting of metal copings to uremic teeth with retentive preparations. © Operative Dentistry.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ghazy, M. H., Aboumadina, M. M., & Mahmoud, S. H. (2014). Retentiveness of metal coping luted to teeth of uremic patients undergoing hemodialysis using five different luting cements. Operative Dentistry, 39(3). https://doi.org/10.2341/12-523-LR2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free