Strict and Uniform Shariah Screening Methodologies in Selected Asian Countries in Comparison with the United States

  • Kasi U
  • Muhammad J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper focuses mainly on the Shariah screening methodologies for Shariah-Compliant firms. This paper compares the Shariah screening methodologies which are used in selected Asian countries and the United States, a ‘powerhouse’ nation. In order to include the analysis of the new benchmark introduced in Malaysia as part of this study, the timeline used in this paper is from November 2013 until November 2014. It can be found that there are similarities and differences between the various Shariah screening methodologies in all the 5 countries, in terms of feasibility, duration, economic viability and fund requirements. It also appears that the Shariah screening methodologies implied in the United States is far more stringent than those implied in the selected Asian countries. On the whole, the results point towards the possibility of generalising the implementation of strict and uniform Shariah screening methodologies within all the country-specific Shariah Indices amongst Muslim nations, globally.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kasi, U., & Muhammad, J. (2016). Strict and Uniform Shariah Screening Methodologies in Selected Asian Countries in Comparison with the United States. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 8(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.5296/ajfa.v8i1.8410

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free