A Qualitative Study of Rural and Remote Australian General Practitioners’ Involvement in High-Acuity Patients

6Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study aimed to understand the experiences, barriers, and facilitators of rural general practitioners’ involvement with high-acuity patients. Semi-structured interviews with rural general practitioners in South Australia who had experience delivering high-acuity care were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed through content and thematic approaches incorporating Potter and Brough’s capacity-building framework. Eighteen interviews were conducted. Barriers identified include the inability to avoid high-acuity work in rural and remote areas, pressure to handle complex presentations, lack of appropriate resources, lack of mental health support for clinicians, and impacts on social life. Enablers included a commitment to community, comradery in rural medicine, training, and experience. We concluded that general practitioners are a vital pillar of rural health service delivery and are inevitably involved in disaster and emergency response. While the involvement of rural general practitioners with high-acuity patients is complex, this study suggested that with the appropriate system, structure and role supports, rural general practitioners could be better empowered to manage high-acuity caseloads locally.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Turner, S., Isaac, V., & Lim, D. (2023). A Qualitative Study of Rural and Remote Australian General Practitioners’ Involvement in High-Acuity Patients. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054548

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free