Multiple sclerosis subgroups: Data-driven clusters based on patient-reported outcomes and a large clinical sample

2Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: While standard clinical assessments provide great value for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), they are limited in their ability to characterize patient perspectives and individual-level symptom heterogeneity. Objectives: To identify PwMS subgroups based on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of physical, cognitive, and emotional symptoms. We also sought to connect PRO-based subgroups with demographic variables, functional impairment, hypertension and smoking status, traditional qualitative multiple sclerosis (MS) symptom groupings, and neuroperformance measurements. Methods: Using a cross-sectional design, we applied latent profile analysis (LPA) to a large database of PROs; analytic sample N = 6619). Results: We identified nine distinct MS subtypes based on PRO patterns. The subtypes were primarily categorized into low, moderate, and high mobility impairment clusters. Approximately 70% of participants were classified in a low mobility impairment group, 10% in a moderate mobility impairment group, and 20% in a high mobility impairment group. Within these subgroups, several unexpected patterns were observed, such as high mobility impairment clusters reporting low non-mobility impairment. Conclusions: The present study highlights an opportunity to advance precision medicine approaches in MS. Combining PROs with data-driven methodology allows for a cost-effective and personalized characterization of symptom presentations. that can inform clinical practice and future research designs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Nadai, A. S., Zamora, R. J., Finch, A., Miller, D. M., Ontaneda, D., Gunzler, D. D., & Briggs, F. S. (2024). Multiple sclerosis subgroups: Data-driven clusters based on patient-reported outcomes and a large clinical sample. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 30(13), 1642–1652. https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585241282763

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free