They Don't All Look Alike: Individuated Impressions of Other Racial Groups

151Citations
Citations of this article
91Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Reliability, content, and homogeneity of own- and other-race impressions were assessed: U.S. White, U.S. Black, and Korean students rated faces of White, Black, or Korean men. High intraracial reliabilities revealed that people of 1 race showed equally high agreement regarding the traits of own- and other-race faces. Racially universal appearance stereotypes-the attractiveness halo effect and the babyface overgeneralization effect-contributed substantially to interracial agreement, which was only marginally lower than intraracial agreement. Moreover, similar attention to variations in appearance yielded similar degrees of own- and other-race trait differentiation. When own- and other-race differences in the differentiation of faces on babyfaceness were statistically controlled, differences in trait differentiation were eliminated. Despite the individuated impressions of other-race faces, certain racial stereotypes persisted.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zebrowitz, L. A., Montepare, J. M., & Lee, H. K. (1993). They Don’t All Look Alike: Individuated Impressions of Other Racial Groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.85

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free