The physiological and mechanical demands of aerobics, indoor cycling, and netball in recreationally active females

0Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Group-based exercise is a popular method of improving fitness. However, limited research exists on the multidisciplinary responses to group-based exercise. Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the physiological and mechanical demands of aerobics, indoor group cycling, and netball. Methods: Fourteen recreationally active females (age 20 ± 2 years, body height 1.65 ± 0.09 m, body mass 65.9 ± 11.8 kg, body fat 26.3 ± 7.2%) participated in three experimental trials (aerobics, indoor cycling, netball) in a randomised order with 1 week intervening. Heart rate, blood lactate, RPE and PlayerLoad™ were measured. Results: A repeated-measures ANOVA revealed mean and peak heart rate (beats·min−1) were lower (P < 0.05) for aerobics (130 ± 114; 176 ± 18) than indoor cycling (150 ± 9; 191 ± 9) and netball (144 ± 11; 195 ± 6), respectively. Blood lactate (mmol·L−1) was higher (P < 0.001) after indoor cycling (5.6 ± 2.6) compared to aerobics (2.2 ± 1.4) and netball (2.5 ± 1.1). RPE was not different between trials. PlayerLoad™ (a.u) during indoor cycling (213.9 ± 46.9) was lower (P < 0.05) than netball (358.5 ± 94.5) and aerobics (296.9 ± 99.0). Conclusions: These results suggest indoor cycling stimulates greater physiological demands, whilst netball and aerobics elicit a higher PlayerLoad™ corresponding to higher mechanical demands. These findings may have implications for exercise prescription in recreationally active females.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McIver, V., Greig, M., & Marrin, K. (2019). The physiological and mechanical demands of aerobics, indoor cycling, and netball in recreationally active females. Sport Sciences for Health, 15(3), 535–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-019-00541-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free