'We've spent too much money to go back now': Credit-crunched literacy and a future for learning

3Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This is an article of activism, application and intervention. It offers new models and modes of teaching and learning by aligning information literacy, media literacy and multiliteracy. The priority is on learning outcomes rather than technological choices, and social justice rather than transferable skills. These are not - obviously - 'either/or' categories, but the author wishes to shift thinking to demonstrate the diversity of assessment options that can activate the insights and innovations of literacy theory. The aim is to show, through examples and applications in university assessment, how students can move from everyday competencies and skill development and into disciplinary and transdisciplinary scholarship. With public funding under threat, the time for 'easy' technological solutions to complicated problems in widening participation agendas requires renewed commitment to literacy, professional development and academic expertise.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brabazon, T. (2011). “We’ve spent too much money to go back now”: Credit-crunched literacy and a future for learning. E-Learning and Digital Media, 8(4), 296–314. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2011.8.4.296

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free