Airway Management during Spaceflight

  • Keller C
  • Brimacombe J
  • Giampalmo M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The authors compared airway management in normogravity and simulated microgravity with and without restraints for laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation, the cuffed oropharyngeal airway, the standard laryngeal mask air- way, and the intubating laryngeal mask airway. Methods: Four trained anesthesiologist–divers participated in the study. Simulated microgravity during spaceflight was ob- tained using a submerged, full-scale model of the International Space Station Life Support Module and neutrally buoyant equip- ment and personnel. Customized, full-torso manikins were used for performing airway management. Each anesthesiolo- gist–diver attempted airway management on 10 occasions with each device in three experimental conditions: (1) with the man- ikin at the poolside (poolside); (2) with the submerged manikin floating free (free-floating); and (3) with the submerged mani- kin fixed to the floor using a restraint (restrained). Airway management failure was defined as failed insertion after three attempts or inadequate device placement after insertion. Results: For the laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation, air- way management failure occurred more frequently in the free- floating (85%) condition than the restrained (8%) and poolside (0%) conditions (both, P < 0.001). Airway management failure was similar among conditions for the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (poolside, 10%; free-floating, 15%; restrained, 15%), la- ryngeal mask airway (poolside, 0%; free-floating, 3%; re- strained, 0%), and intubating laryngeal mask airway (poolside, 5%; free-floating, 5%; restrained, 10%). Airway management failure for the laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation was usu- ally caused by failed insertion (> 90%), and for the cuffed oropharyngeal airway, laryngeal mask airway, and intubating laryngeal mask airway, it was always a result of inadequate placement. Conclusion: The emphasis placed on the use of restraints for conventional tracheal intubation in microgravity is appropri- ate. Extratracheal airway devices may be useful when restraints cannot be applied or intubation is difficult.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Keller, C., Brimacombe, J., Giampalmo, M., Kleinsasser, A., Loeckinger, A., Giampalmo, G., & Pühringer, F. (2000). Airway Management during Spaceflight. Anesthesiology, 92(5), 1237–1241. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200005000-00010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free