Performance and stability comparison of Aemion™ and Aemion+™ membranes for vanadium redox flow batteries

12Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Anion exchange membranes (AEMs) have shown a significant rise in performance and durability within recent years for applications such as electrolysis and fuel cells. However, in vanadium redox-flow batteries, their use is of particular interest to lower costs and self-discharge rates compared to conventional perfluorinated sulfonic acid-based ionomers such as Nafion. In this work we evaluate the properties of two commercial AEMs, Aemion™ and Aemion+™, based onex situcharacterizations, an accelerated stress test degradation study (>1000 hours storage in highly oxidizing VO2+electrolyte at 35 °C) and electrochemical battery cycle tests. All membranes feature low ionic resistances of below 320 mO cm2, enabling battery cycling at 100 mA cm-2. Aemion shows considerable VO2+formation within a VO2+stress test, whereas Aemion+ remains almost unaffected in the 1058 h stress test. Evaluating self-discharge data, cycling performance and durability data, Aemion+™ (50 µm thickness) features the best properties for vanadium redox-flow battery operation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shanahan, B., Britton, B., Belletti, A., Vierrath, S., & Breitwieser, M. (2021). Performance and stability comparison of AemionTM and Aemion+TM membranes for vanadium redox flow batteries. RSC Advances, 11(22), 13077–13084. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ra01079d

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free