SDHA secondary findings in germline testing: counseling and surveillance considerations

6Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This commentary explores the complexities faced by clinicians when encountering a secondary SDHA pathogenic variant (PV) in patients without a personal or family history of SDHA-related tumors. The increasing use of germline multi-gene panel testing has led to a rise in such secondary findings, necessitating a nuanced approach to counseling, surveillance, and decision-making. We aim to discuss the current data surrounding the penetrance of SDHA PVs, the spectrum of screening guidelines, recommendations for educating individuals and families about their secondary findings, and the need for future research to optimize care for these individuals. Practical recommendations for clinicians dealing with patients with secondary SDHA findings include acknowledging the limitations of existing guidelines, fostering shared decision-making, and considering specialist referrals. Overall, the evolving landscape of SDHA penetrance data warrants ongoing reassessment of surveillance approaches.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Skefos, C. M., Brock, P. L., Blouch, E., & Greenberg, S. E. (2024, January 1). SDHA secondary findings in germline testing: counseling and surveillance considerations. Endocrine Oncology. BioScientifica Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1530/EO-23-0043

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free