Immunohistochemical markers of soft tissue tumors: Pathologic diagnosis, genetic contributions, and therapeutic options

15Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

After ~30 years of widespread usage, immunohistochemistry (IHC) has become a standard method of diagnosis for surgical pathology. Because of the plethora of diagnoses and often subtle nature of diagnostic criteria, IHC finds particular utility in soft tissue tumors. The use of progressively small amounts of tissue for diagnosis highlights the importance of this method. The sensitivity and crispness of IHC stains have progressively improved with the advent of new techniques. Traditionally, IHC detects cell-typic markers that characterize cell phenotypes, such as chromogranin for neuroectodermal tissue, myogenin for skeletal muscle, and cytokeratin for epithelium. However, the advent of genetic discoveries have led to IHC testing for detection of fusion gene products or overexpressed oncogenes associated with deletions and mutations. Proliferation-based markers such as Ki-67 can also be used for prognosis and grading, but more standardization is needed. Development of monoclonal antibody-based pharmaceuticals, such as imatinib or crizotinib, holds the promise of tailored anticancer therapy. IHC thus has assumed importance not only for diagnosis but also for guidance of personalized medicine.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Parham, D. M. (2015). Immunohistochemical markers of soft tissue tumors: Pathologic diagnosis, genetic contributions, and therapeutic options. Analytical Chemistry Insights, 2015, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4137/ACI.S32730

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free