Abstract
In this 3-year, open-label, multicenter study, 57 maintenance heart transplant recipients (>1 year after transplant) with renal insufficiency (eGFR 30–60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) were randomized to start everolimus with CNI withdrawal ( N=29 ) or continue their current CNI-based immunosuppression ( N=28 ). The primary endpoint, change in measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) from baseline to year 3, did not differ significantly between both groups (+7.0 mL/min in the everolimus group versus +1.9 mL/min in the CNI group, p=0.18 ). In the on-treatment analysis, the difference did reach statistical significance (+9.4 mL/min in the everolimus group versus +1.9 mL/min in the CNI group, p=0.047 ). The composite safety endpoint of all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, or treated acute rejection was not different between groups. Nonfatal adverse events occurred in 96.6% of patients in the everolimus group and 57.1% in the CNI group ( p<0.001 ). Ten patients (34.5%) in the everolimus group discontinued the study drug during follow-up due to adverse events. The poor adherence to the everolimus therapy might have masked a potential benefit of CNI withdrawal on renal function.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Van Keer, J., Derthoo, D., Van Caenegem, O., De Pauw, M., Nellessen, E., Duerinckx, N., … Vanhaecke, J. (2017). The CECARI Study: Everolimus (Certican®) Initiation and Calcineurin Inhibitor Withdrawal in Maintenance Heart Transplant Recipients with Renal Insufficiency: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial. Journal of Transplantation, 2017, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6347138
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.