Playful Computational Thinking Learning in and Beyond Early Childhood Classrooms: Insights from Collaborative Action Research of Two Teacher-Researchers

4Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Blending child-led exploration with purposeful teacher guidance and clearly defined learning goals, playful learning has been promoted as a promising approach for introducing computational thinking (CT) in early childhood education (ECE). However, there is a lack of practical guidance for teachers on how to design and implement playful CT learning effectively. To address this gap, we conducted a collaborative action research project and asked these two questions: (1) How can teachers effectively prepare and design a playful learning CT program using tangible CT toys? (2) How do teachers facilitate playful learning in the CT program? Through iterative cycles of planning, acting, observing, and reflecting, the first and second authors (teacher-researchers) designed and implemented their CT programs in a preschool classroom and an afterschool program respectively, and collected data including video recordings of sessions, participant-generated artifacts, program documentation, and anecdotal reflection notes. Based on our thematic analysis of the data, we identified practical principles for selecting CT toys, three key themes for CT program design and preparation—interest, ownership, and application, and two forms of teacher scaffolding during implementation: embodied approach and storytelling as scaffolding and assessment. The findings highlight practical ways that teachers can enhance children’s engagement, problem-solving skills, and conceptual understanding of CT, while also promoting autonomy and creativity through coding and storytelling.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xing, G. Y., Cady, A. G., & Wang, X. C. (2025). Playful Computational Thinking Learning in and Beyond Early Childhood Classrooms: Insights from Collaborative Action Research of Two Teacher-Researchers. Education Sciences, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070840

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free