Exchangeable zinc pool size at birth is smaller in small-for-gestational- age than in appropriate-for-gestational-age preterm infants

18Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants are susceptible to postnatal zinc deficiency, but whether this susceptibility is due to intrauterine factors or to high postnatal growth requirements is unknown. Objective: We hypothesized that the size of the exchangeable zinc pool (EZP), which reflects metabolically available zinc, would be smaller in SGA than in appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) infants born prematurely. Design: Intravenous 70Zn (45 μg/kg) was administered to 10 SGA infants (8 boys) with a mean (±SD) gestational age of 33.3 ± 1.8 wk and to 11 AGA infants (8 boys) with a mean (±SD) gestational age of 32.4 ± 1.2 wk within 24 h of birth. The EZP was determined from isotope enrichment in spot urine collections on days 3-7. Results: The mean birth weight of the SGA infants was 1.30 ± 0.2 kg and of the AGA infants was 1.84 ± 0.3 kg (P = 0.0001). The EZP size was significantly smaller in the SGA than in the AGA infants on an absolute basis (13.3 ± 2.8 and 25.2 ± 8.1 mg; P = 0.0002) and relative to body weight (10.3 ± 2.5 and 13.9 ± 4.5 mg/kg; P = 0.02). The difference remained significant after adjustment for gestational age and birth weight. Conclusion: These data provide evidence for differential zinc status at birth between SGA and AGA infants born prematurely at similar stages of gestation and offer at least a partial explanation for the reported benefits of postnatal zinc supplementation. © 2006 American Society for Nutrition.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Krebs, N. F., Westcott, J. L., Rodden, D. J., Ferguson, K. W., Miller, L. V., & Hambidge, K. M. (2006). Exchangeable zinc pool size at birth is smaller in small-for-gestational- age than in appropriate-for-gestational-age preterm infants. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 84(6), 1340–1343. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/84.6.1340

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free