Central line mechanical complication rate in emergency medicine patients

46Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Central line (CL) placement in the emergency department (ED) is a common practice. Previously published small-scale studies have quoted mechanical complication rates in emergency medicine patients of 10-15%. Objective: To determine the mechanical complication rate of central venous catheterization in a large (65, 000 visits/year) academic urban ED. Methods: This was a retrospective review of all ED-placed CLs over a three-year period from May 1995 to May 1998. Data were collected as part of a monthly quality assurance project and analyzed using Fisher's exact test (significance = p < 0.05). Central lines were defined as subclavian, internal jugular, femoral, and interosseous lines. Mechanical complication was defined as a pneumothorax, hematoma, line misplacement, or hemothorax. Results: There were 22 complications of a total of 643 CLs placed [complication rate 3.4% (95% CI = 1.9% to 4.8%)]. The complication rate for patients with a confirmatory chest x-ray receiving a subclavian or internal jugular CL (excluding all patients who died prior to x-ray evaluation of CL) was 6.2% (22/355) (95% CI = 3.9% to 9.3%). There were 402 (63%) CLs placed during a code with a complication rate of 2.2% (95% CI = 1.0% to 4.2%), 79% (317/402) medical and 21% (85/402) trauma codes. Thirty-seven percent (241) of the CLs were placed on an "elective urgent" basis. Residents placed the majority of CLs (567/643), with a complication rate of 3%. There was no statistically significant difference in complication rates based on level of resident training. Conclusions: The CL mechanical complication rate in the ED at this institution is 3.4%. This is substantially lower than previously reported mechanical complication rates.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Steele, R., & Irvin, C. B. (2001). Central line mechanical complication rate in emergency medicine patients. Academic Emergency Medicine, 8(2), 204–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01292.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free