Neoliberalization and urban redevelopment: the impact of public policy on multiple dimensions of spatial inequality

16Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of public policy on different dimensions of spatial inequality. We not only study residential segregation but also housing market access and inequality in terms of neighborhood status. We chart the impact of urban redevelopment policies in two Dutch cities—Amsterdam and Rotterdam—through a unique longitudinal and full-population dataset that enables us to distinguish the contributions of demolition, new construction, and tenure conversion to various dimensions of spatial inequality. We find that policy measures that reduce segregation may reduce access to housing (as happened in Amsterdam) while measures that promote upgrading may exacerbate inequalities between neighborhoods (as happened in Rotterdam). Distinguishing between different kinds of policy measures and dimensions of spatial inequality, we argue, allows for a more nuanced and comprehensive understanding of urban redevelopment and better insight into the trade-offs involved in policy decisions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Uitermark, J., Hochstenbach, C., & Groot, J. (2024). Neoliberalization and urban redevelopment: the impact of public policy on multiple dimensions of spatial inequality. Urban Geography, 45(4), 541–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2023.2203583

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free