Comparison of two methods for predicting surface roughness in turning stainless steel AISI 316L

  • Morales Tamayo Y
  • Beltrán Reyna R
  • López Bustamante R
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

ABSTRACT The present study aimed to explore various models to predict the surface roughness in dry turning of AISI 316L stainless steel. Multiple Regression Methods and Artificial Neural Networks Methods were implemented to study the effect of cutting speed, feed, and machining time. In order to increase the reliability and soundness of the registered surface roughness values, a complete Factorial Design was implemented. A statistical comparison of the resultant models was performed. The results produced by both methods show that the surface roughness can be predicted. Results of the Artificial Neural Networks models show a better accuracy than those derived from the Multiple Regression models.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morales Tamayo, Y., Beltrán Reyna, R. F., López Bustamante, R. J., Zamora Hernández, Y., López Cedeño, K., & Terán Herrera, H. C. (2018). Comparison of two methods for predicting surface roughness in turning stainless steel AISI 316L. Ingeniare. Revista Chilena de Ingeniería, 26(1), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-33052018000100097

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free