Additional results for 'Sequential design approaches for bioequivalence studies with crossover designs'

44Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In 2008, this group published a paper on approaches for two-stage crossover bioequivalence (BE) studies that allowed for the reestimation of the second-stage sample size based on the variance estimated from the first-stage results. The sequential methods considered used an assumed GMR of 0.95 as part of the method for determining power and sample size. This note adds results for an assumed GMR = 0.90. Two of the methods recommended for GMR = 0.95 in the earlier paper have some unacceptable increases in Type I error rate when the GMR is changed to 0.90. If a sponsor wants to assume 0.90 for the GMR, Method D is recommended. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Montague, T. H., Potvin, D., Diliberti, C. E., Hauck, W. W., Parr, A. F., & Schuirmann, D. J. (2012, January). Additional results for “Sequential design approaches for bioequivalence studies with crossover designs.” Pharmaceutical Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.483

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free