Abstract
The overall economical benefits of Building Information Modeling are generally comprehensible, but are there other problems with the implementation of BIM as a formulized system in a field that ultimately is dependent on a creative input? Is optimization and economic benefit really contributing with an architectural quality? In Denmark the implementation of the digital working methods related to BIM has been introduced by government law in 2007. Will the important role of the architect as designer change in accordance with these new methods, and does the idea of one big integrated model represent a paradox in relation to designing? The BIM mindset requires changes on many levels.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Hermund, A. (2009). Building Information Modeling in the Architectural Design Phases And Why Compulsory BIM Can Provoke Distress Among Architects. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (pp. 75–81). Education and research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe. https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2009.075
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.