Co-curation as civic practice in community engagement

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

How can engagement practices remain open to new dialogues, issues and possibilities beyond existing hierarchies and often exploitative conditions? The acts of co-curation are investigated as a mode of community engagement, focusing on the Cambridge Room, an experimental urban room (UR) in Cambridge, UK. By examining three projects in one of the UK’s most unequal cities, this paper reflects on the forms and dynamics of community engagement and knowledge co-creation in URs, often seen as an alternative version to urban living labs. Drawing on emerging theories of care and civic empowerment within curatorial practices, this paper argues that co-curation in urban contexts functions as a practice of enabling, educating, critiquing and making public, reinforcing the civic dimension of participatory engagement. The Cambridge Room case study demonstrates how through co-curation URs can facilitate community-led initiatives, foster resource sharing and enhance collaboration across diverse demographic groups as multiple agents of care. At the same time, the case study reveals that co-curation faces critical challenges: building trust amid conflicting interests; engaging powerful yet underrepresented commercial stakeholders like developers; and generating robust evidence of impact through indicators including participation rates and influences on planning processes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, Z., Sunikka-Blank, M., Purohit, R., & Samuel, F. (2025). Co-curation as civic practice in community engagement. Buildings and Cities, 6(1), 899–916. https://doi.org/10.5334/BC.633

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free