Evaluation of a carbapenem-saving strategy using empirical combination regimen of piperacillin-tazobactam and amikacin in hemato-oncology patients

5Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We implemented a carbapenem-saving strategy in hemato-oncology patients from 2013, using an empirical combination of piperacillin-tazobactam and amikacin for high-risk hemato-oncology patients with febrile neutropenia, who remain hemodynamically unstable > 72 hours despite initial cefepime treatment. All-cause mortality was not different between the two periods (6.54 and 6.57 deaths per 1,000 person-day, P = 0.926). Group 2 carbapenem use significantly decreased after strategy implementation (78.43 vs. 67.43 monthly days of therapy, P = 0.018), while carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli did not show meaningful changes during the study period. Our carbapenem-saving strategy could effectively suppress carbapenem use without an increase of overall mortality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ko, J. H., Kim, S. H., Kang, C. I., Cho, S. Y., Lee, N. Y., Chung, D. R., … Song, J. H. (2019). Evaluation of a carbapenem-saving strategy using empirical combination regimen of piperacillin-tazobactam and amikacin in hemato-oncology patients. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e17

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free