It all happens at once: understanding electoral behaviour in second-order elections

46Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The second-order election (SOE) model as originally formulated by Reif and Schmitt (1980) suggests that, relative to the preceding first-order election result, turnout is lower in SOEs, government and big parties lose, and small and ideologically extreme parties win. These regularities are not static but dynamic and related to the first-order electoral cycle. These predictions of the SOE model have often been tested using aggregate data. The fact that they are based on individual-level hypotheses has received less attention. The main aim of this article is to restate the micro-level hypotheses for the SOE model and run a rigorous test for the 2004 and 2014 European elections. Using data from the European Election Studies voter surveys, our analysis reveals signs of sincere, but also strategic abstentions in European Parliament elections. Both strategic and sincere motivations are also leading to SOE defection. It all happens at once.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schmitt, H., Sanz, A., Braun, D., & Teperoglou, E. (2020). It all happens at once: understanding electoral behaviour in second-order elections. Politics and Governance, 8(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i1.2513

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free